<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Tomb of Pacal dedicated in 9.13.0.0.0 ??? - Day Out of Time - tribe.net</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://doot.tribe.net/thread/3c040895-9fa5-4162-af8c-9587f85d45d9?format=atom" />
  <subtitle>Tribe.net. Local Connections</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Tomb of Pacal dedicated in 9.13.0.0.0 ???</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://doot.tribe.net/thread/3c040895-9fa5-4162-af8c-9587f85d45d9#5ec7f764-efba-4309-aba9-ca20ead94228" />
    <author>
      <name>Tezcatlipoca</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://doot.tribe.net/thread/3c040895-9fa5-4162-af8c-9587f85d45d9#5ec7f764-efba-4309-aba9-ca20ead94228</id>
    <updated>2007-10-08T22:28:12Z</updated>
    <published>2007-10-08T22:28:12Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hello there,&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
I would like to know one thing: is there any inscription, any archaeological proof showing that the Tomb of Pakal was dedicated in 9.13.0.0.0, 692 AD, as José Argüelles claims? I like confirming things and not blindly believing anything I read, so that's why I'm asking this.&#xD;
&#xD;
Any help, any clue will be of the greatest importance. Thanks for your time!&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
Regards,&#xD;
Tezcatlipoca</summary>
    <dc:creator>Tezcatlipoca</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-08T22:28:12Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>



